Right to print it, wrong to put it on the front page. If they'd run it several pages inside with a 'So what' line like the title of this thread, they could have been on the side of the angels. This business of stuff being censored only in Britain (remember Mrs T and 'Spycatcher'?) makes us the laughing stock of the world and also draws attention to the very thing that our Lords and Masters are trying to conceal.
I think that's completely wrong. You are ignoring the 'public interest' point. Thus your comparison and use of the word 'censorship' in association Thatcher is invalid and suggests you have missed the point. There is no public interest in what PH gets up to in private
, assuming it's legal.
Agree Richard , I do feel sorry for Prince Harry, how must he feel to have been "stabbed in the back " by a so called friend. Harry was at a party, we the public wouldnt have seen or known about, if someone there hadnt took photo's
then sold them to the press. it wouldnt have been in our interests to know about it. and doesnt affect public interest now we know. let the voyers have their pleasure. "peeping toms" leave me feeling uncomfortable. The sordid part of human nature.
The Sun newspaper is gutter press and how.